<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iKOZ &#187; FM&amp;T</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kosso.co.uk/category/fmt-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kosso.co.uk</link>
	<description>{ memoirs and scars of an interactive multimedia veteran }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 04:12:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Long Live The BBC!</title>
		<link>http://blog.kosso.co.uk/2007/03/14/long-live-the-bbc/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.kosso.co.uk/2007/03/14/long-live-the-bbc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kosso</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC Jam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FM&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Arrington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TechCrunch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV License]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kosso.co.uk/wp_blog/?p=376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A while ago, Mike Arrington from TechCrunch called for the dissolution of the BBC at the FOWA conference. Today the BBC announces it is pulling the plug on the &#8216;BBC Jam&#8216; project &#8211; an online learning resource for school kids. He has some regrets about what he said and asks today what people in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A while ago, Mike Arrington from TechCrunch <a href="http://kosso.wordpress.com/2007/02/22/techcrunchs-mike-arrington-calls-for-the-end-of-the-bbc/">called for the dissolution of the BBC</a> at the FOWA conference. Today <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/6449619.stm">the BBC announces it is pulling the plug</a> on the &#8216;<a href="https://jam.bbc.co.uk/Auth/Welcome.aspx?TBReturnUrl=%2fDefault.aspx">BBC Jam</a>&#8216; project &#8211; an online learning resource for school kids.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/03/14/bbc-may-be-stifling-startups-suspends-bbc-jam-following-complaints/">He has some regrets about what he said</a> and asks today what people in the UK think about this and the boundaries that the BBC can go to or cross regarding all this.</p>
<p>I have a few things to say &#8211; some on top &#8211; some off &#8211; but just to give some more perspective to this conversation  (I used to work for BBC News Interactive) :</p>
<p>BBC (especially in R&amp;D) are always looking push the boundaries &#8211; without offending the license payer. And they have really done  amazing things &#8211; especially in the past.</p>
<p>Back when radio started, the BBC created content and transmitted it : it sold many radios.</p>
<p>Same thing happened with television. The BBC helped to create the industry and helped (indirectly) sell loads of TVs through huge amounts of technical research and achievements.   A &#8216;bit&#8217; like Steve Jobs helped push portable audio and its formats by selling an iPod.</p>
<p>Arguably, without the BBC, the media industry it is part of wouldn&#8217;t be where it is today.</p>
<p>The BBC were recently told by the Director of Future Media and Technology (Ashley Highfield) that it must &#8220;Get web savvy or we die..&#8221;. There are going to be ALOT of changes coming in how the BBC manages and responds to its online strategies and goals set for the future.</p>
<p>&#8216;Some&#8217; people at the BBC look at you like you just produced fire from your hands if you mention &#8216;Web2.0&#8242; and &#8216;social networks&#8217; &#8212; &#8220;oooooh! prettyyy!.. must have some&#8221;</p>
<p>So, when the idea of a site for children&#8217;s education and learning comes up, all replete with tasty doses of &#8216;Web 2.0&#8242;, &#8216; social networking&#8217;, &#8216;collaboration&#8217;, &#8216;virtual world&#8217; etc. &#8211; which companies fall over themselves for these days (sometimes justifiably/worthwhile) &#8211; then you have to see what an easy sell it was to whatever board of people gave it the OK. (quite possibly, many of which didn&#8217;t have the slightest idea what it was &#8211; but it sounded &#8216;hip&#8217; &#8211; so yay! let&#8217;s pwn it d00d)</p>
<p>I learned SO MUCH from the television as a child in the UK (as I am sure the teachers did too!). I learned alot of early computer skills on a BBC-A, BBC Micro, etc.. which OK, wasn&#8217;t strictly BBC, but I didn&#8217;t see Clive Sinclair or Research Machines claiming unfairness then &#8211; it was GOOD for the industry in the long run. Easy.</p>
<p>The BBC also has an obligation to outsource the production of a large percentage of content to outside companies/contractors. That&#8217;s where they give something back. Small companies can see their logo/credits role by and BBC1. What a feeling! Think of all the new leads and opportunities it creates   for them.</p>
<p>Alas, not for those who are not chosen by the BBC. And I think you&#8217;ll find it&#8217;s those people who protest the most &#8211; and rightly so, in some cases &#8211; as here &#8211; possibly. I&#8217;m undecided about BBC Jam. I just wanted to add a bit more perspective.</p>
<p>The big thing that sets up the BBC as a huge target in all this is naturally the TV License.  For those of you out there who still don&#8217;t know : Everyone in the UK who owns a TV set or a Radio is required by law to pay an annual TV License. A colour TV Licence costs £131.50 and it&#8217;s cheaper for a black and white set (lol).</p>
<p>So, it&#8217;s very much like a subscription model &#8211; but one you are forced into paying for, if you simply own a TV set.</p>
<p>As a child I used to ask &#8220;Then why doesn&#8217;t someone build a telly which can&#8217;t be tuned in to BBC1 or BBC2?&#8221;  (we only had two BBC tv channels back then) &#8211; &#8220;Then we don&#8217;t need to pay the TV License&#8221; (which probably meant I could have more candy or something)</p>
<p>By removing those content channels from the device, surely we don&#8217;t have to pay for it.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;m getting at is, the BBC are forging forward into technology &#8211; sometimes forgetting the content itself (but that&#8217;s another rant) &#8211; in an area and network (the internet) where choice is endless. Also we have more and more digital tv channels cropping up all the time (mostly useless) &#8211; the choice is growing. Every second my eyes are watching YouTube or other video online, they&#8217;re not looking at the TV set (we already, forcibly paid for)</p>
<p>So, the more they develop online and digitally, I think the BBC will have to change to a subscription model eventually &#8211; because I can assure you, there&#8217;s a hell of alot more non-BBC content out there that I can put on my TV screen &#8211; and it&#8217;s growing by the day.</p>
<p>The TV License is likely doomed, <strong>but long live the BBC!!!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.kosso.co.uk/2007/03/14/long-live-the-bbc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

