<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Question Of Tagging</title>
	<link>http://blog.kosso.co.uk/2007/01/31/a-question-of-tagging/</link>
	<description>A New Blog For Kosso</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[JohnHarnett]]></title>
		<link>http://blog.kosso.co.uk/2007/01/31/a-question-of-tagging/#comment-1828</link>
		<author><![CDATA[JohnHarnett]]></author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 17:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kosso.co.uk/2007/01/31/a-question-of-tagging/#comment-1828</guid>
		<description>Heh Kosso, I agree, there's always trouble in my mind when it comes to how to describe something with more than one word.  But then I think that a side effect of tagging is to encourage one-word descriptions over phrases. Similiarly, when one is searching for a particular tag, doesn't one usually search based on one word?

Just for devils advocate, how about allowing both! or making it a user setting?

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh Kosso, I agree, there&#8217;s always trouble in my mind when it comes to how to describe something with more than one word.  But then I think that a side effect of tagging is to encourage one-word descriptions over phrases. Similiarly, when one is searching for a particular tag, doesn&#8217;t one usually search based on one word?</p>
<p>Just for devils advocate, how about allowing both! or making it a user setting?</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[Kosso]]></title>
		<link>http://blog.kosso.co.uk/2007/01/31/a-question-of-tagging/#comment-1829</link>
		<author><![CDATA[Kosso]]></author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kosso.co.uk/2007/01/31/a-question-of-tagging/#comment-1829</guid>
		<description>HI there John! You think?  The problem I see with spaces - AND using "quotes for multiple words" can be a pain, and people forget to use them (the quotes) quite often leading to many unintended tags.

Commas are not more work, in fact less, as you simply use once to delimit one word or more than one word.

city, USA, New York

not

city USA "New York"

hmmmm jury's still out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI there John! You think?  The problem I see with spaces - AND using &#8220;quotes for multiple words&#8221; can be a pain, and people forget to use them (the quotes) quite often leading to many unintended tags.</p>
<p>Commas are not more work, in fact less, as you simply use once to delimit one word or more than one word.</p>
<p>city, USA, New York</p>
<p>not</p>
<p>city USA &#8220;New York&#8221;</p>
<p>hmmmm jury&#8217;s still out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: <![CDATA[JohnHarnett]]></title>
		<link>http://blog.kosso.co.uk/2007/01/31/a-question-of-tagging/#comment-1830</link>
		<author><![CDATA[JohnHarnett]]></author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 09:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kosso.co.uk/2007/01/31/a-question-of-tagging/#comment-1830</guid>
		<description>spaces,for,me,please,commas,are,more,work,plus,delicious,uses,spaces,and,they ,are,the,granddaddy,of,tagging,in,my,mind,.,.,.,.,.,.,.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spaces,for,me,please,commas,are,more,work,plus,delicious,uses,spaces,and,they ,are,the,granddaddy,of,tagging,in,my,mind,.,.,.,.,.,.,.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
